HTSC Cuprate Phase Diagram Using a Modified Boson-Fermion-Gossamer Model Describing Competing Orders, a Quantum Critical Point and Possible Resonance Complex
R. H. Squire, N. H. March, M. L. Booth

TL;DR
This paper introduces a modified boson-fermion-gossamer model for the cuprate phase diagram, incorporating competing orders, a quantum critical point, and resonance phenomena to explain high-temperature superconductivity and pseudogap behavior.
Contribution
It proposes a novel Feshbach resonance-based model that captures the complex interplay of orders and quantum criticality in cuprates, advancing understanding of their phase diagram.
Findings
Identifies a quantum critical point where superconductivity is suppressed by preformed pairs.
Explains the pseudogap as a localized superconductor with no phase coherence.
Suggests resonant pairs enable long-range coherence despite short coherence length.
Abstract
There has been considerable effort expended towards understanding high temperature superconductors (HTSC), and more specifically the cuprate phase diagram as a function of doping level. Yet, the only agreement seems to be that HTSC is an example of a strongly correlated material where Coulomb repulsion plays a major role. This manuscript proposes a model based on a Feshbach resonance pairing mechanism and competing orders. An initial BCS-type superconductivity at high doping is suppressed in the two particle channel by a localized preformed pair (PP) [1] (circular density wave) creating a quantum critical point (QCP). As doping continues to diminish, the PP then participates in a Feshbach resonance complex that creates a new electron (hole) pair that delocalizes and constitutes HTSC and the characteristic dome [2]. The resonant nature of the new pair contributes to its short coherence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
