Dissipation scales and anomalous sinks in steady two-dimensional turbulence
Eleftherios Gkioulekas

TL;DR
This paper uses the fusion rules hypothesis and non-perturbative locality to analyze dissipation scales and anomalous sinks in steady two-dimensional turbulence, revealing how these concepts determine inertial range boundaries and sink behaviors.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the fusion rules hypothesis, combined with locality, dictates the boundary between inertial and dissipation ranges and explains the emergence of anomalous sinks in 2D turbulence.
Findings
Fusion rules hypothesis determines inertial-dissipation boundary.
Anomalous enstrophy and energy sinks arise from fusion rules.
Logarithmic corrections and hyperdiffusion affect sink resilience.
Abstract
In previous papers I have argued that the \emph{fusion rules hypothesis}, which was originally introduced by L'vov and Procaccia in the context of the problem of three-dimensional turbulence, can be used to gain a deeper insight in understanding the enstrophy cascade and inverse energy cascade of two-dimensional turbulence. In the present paper we show that the fusion rules hypothesis, combined with \emph{non-perturbative locality}, itself a consequence of the fusion rules hypothesis, dictates the location of the boundary separating the inertial range from the dissipation range. In so doing, the hypothesis that there may be an anomalous enstrophy sink at small scales and an anomalous energy sink at large scales emerges as a consequence of the fusion rules hypothesis. More broadly, we illustrate the significance of viewing inertial ranges as multi-dimensional regions where the fully…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
