Lossless Astronomical Image Compression and the Effects of Noise
W. D. Pence, R. Seaman, and R. L. White

TL;DR
This paper evaluates lossless astronomical image compression methods, analyzing how noise impacts compression ratios and speeds, and identifies Rice as the most efficient algorithm among those tested.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of various lossless compression algorithms on astronomical images and introduces a theoretical model relating noise to compression performance.
Findings
Rice compression offers the best balance of speed and compression ratio.
Compression ratio is influenced by the noise level, with higher noise reducing compressibility.
The study provides a practical toolset (fpack and funpack) for astronomers to efficiently compress FITS images.
Abstract
We compare a variety of lossless image compression methods on a large sample of astronomical images and show how the compression ratios and speeds of the algorithms are affected by the amount of noise in the images. In the ideal case where the image pixel values have a random Gaussian distribution, the equivalent number of uncompressible noise bits per pixel is given by Nbits =log2(sigma * sqrt(12)) and the lossless compression ratio is given by R = BITPIX / Nbits + K where BITPIX is the bit length of the pixel values and K is a measure of the efficiency of the compression algorithm. We perform image compression tests on a large sample of integer astronomical CCD images using the GZIP compression program and using a newer FITS tiled-image compression method that currently supports 4 compression algorithms: Rice, Hcompress, PLIO, and GZIP. Overall, the Rice compression algorithm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
