Notes on Recent Approaches Concerning the Kirchhoff-Law-Johnson-Noise-based Secure Key Exchange
Laszlo B. Kish, Tamas Horvath

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the security claims of Kirchhoff-Law-Johnson-Noise-based key exchange, identifying modeling artifacts, unphysical simulation conditions, and demonstrating vulnerabilities to active man-in-the-middle attacks.
Contribution
It clarifies the physical limitations of the method, debunks simulation artifacts, and introduces a more robust circuit design while exposing active attack vulnerabilities.
Findings
Simulation artifacts are due to unphysical parameters.
Passive security is confirmed, but active attacks succeed.
Dropping high-risk bits is insufficient for security.
Abstract
We critically analyze the results and claims in [Physics Letters A 373 (2009) 901-904]. We show that the strong security leak appeared in the simulations is only an artifact and not caused by "multiple reflections". Since no wave modes exist at cable length of 5% of the shortest wavelength of the signal, no wave is present to reflect it. In the high wave impedance limit, the conditions used in the simulations are heavily unphysical (requiring cable diameters up to 28000 times greater than the measured size of the known universe) and the results are modeling artifacts due to the unphysical values. At the low cable impedance limit, the observed artifacts are due to violating the recommended (and tested) conditions by neglecting the cable capacitance restrictions and using about 100 times longer cable than recommended without cable capacitance compensation arrangement. We implement…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
