Pulsars versus Dark Matter Interpretation of ATIC/PAMELA
Dmitry Malyshev, Ilias Cholis, and Joseph Gelfand

TL;DR
This paper compares pulsar and dark matter sources for high-energy electrons and positrons, analyzing flux contributions, spectral features, and implications for recent cosmic ray data from ATIC, PAMELA, Fermi, and HESS.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of pulsar and dark matter contributions to cosmic ray electrons and positrons, highlighting spectral features and their implications for interpreting recent data.
Findings
High-energy flux dominated by nearby pulsars, producing spectral bumps.
Absence of spectral features suggests dark matter or suppressed pulsar fluctuations.
Features can be smeared by spatial energy loss variations during propagation.
Abstract
In this paper, we study the flux of electrons and positrons injected by pulsars and by annihilating or decaying dark matter in the context of recent ATIC, PAMELA, Fermi, and HESS data. We review the flux from a single pulsar and derive the flux from a distribution of pulsars. We point out that the particle acceleration in the pulsar magnetosphere is insufficient to explain the observed excess of electrons and positrons with energy E ~ 1 TeV and one has to take into account an additional acceleration of electrons at the termination shock between the pulsar and its wind nebula. We show that at energies less than a few hundred GeV, the flux from a continuous distribution of pulsars provides a good approximation to the expected flux from pulsars in the Australia Telescope National Facility (ATNF) catalog. At higher energies, we demonstrate that the electron/positron flux measured at the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
