Experiment, theory and the Casimir effect
V. M. Mostepanenko

TL;DR
This paper reviews theoretical and experimental issues in measuring the Casimir effect, discusses the validity of various models and approximations, and examines recent approaches to thermal Casimir forces, highlighting inconsistencies with thermodynamics and experiments.
Contribution
It clarifies the physical and theoretical foundations of Casimir force calculations, evaluates the validity of the proximity force approximation, and critiques recent models including screening effects.
Findings
Rectangular box results agree with piston configurations.
Proximity force approximation has limitations beyond first principles.
Screening-based thermal Casimir models are inconsistent with thermodynamics.
Abstract
Several problems at the interface between the field-theoretical description of the Casimir effect and experiments on measuring the Casimir force are discussed. One of these problems is connected with the definition of the Casimir free energy in ideal metal rectangular boxes satisfying the general physical requirements. It is shown that the consideration of rectangular boxes with a partition (piston) does not negate the previously known results obtained for boxes without a piston. Both sets of results are found to be in mutual agreement. Another problem is related to the use of the proximity force approximation for the interpretation of the experimental data and to the search of analytical results beyond the PFA based on the first principles of quantum field theory. Next, we discuss concepts of experimental precision and of the measure of agreement between experiment and theory. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
