Stability, Instability, and Error of the Force-based Quasicontinuum Approximation
Matthew Dobson, Mitchell Luskin, and Christoph Ortner

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the stability and error of the force-based quasicontinuum approximation, demonstrating its high accuracy and providing theoretical justification for its efficiency in coupling atomistic and continuum models.
Contribution
The paper proves the stability properties of the force-based quasicontinuum method and derives optimal error estimates, addressing the challenge of non-positivity of the linearized operator.
Findings
The linearized quasicontinuum operator is typically not positive definite.
No uniform inf-sup stability holds for discrete $W^{1,p}$-$W^{1,q}$ duality pairing with 1/p+1/q=1.
An inf-sup stability condition for discrete $W^{1,inity}$-$W^{1,1}$ pairing leads to optimal error estimates.
Abstract
Due to their algorithmic simplicity and high accuracy, force-based model coupling techniques are an exciting development in computational physics. For example, the force-based quasicontinuum approximation is the only known pointwise consistent quasicontinuum approximation for coupling a general atomistic model with a finite element continuum model. In this paper, we analyze the stability of the force-based quasicontinuum approximation. We then use our stability result to obtain an optimal order error analysis of this coupling method that provides theoretical justification for the high accuracy of the force-based quasicontinuum approximation -- the computational efficiency of continuum modeling can be utilized without the loss of significant accuracy if defects are captured in the atomistic region. The main challenge we need to overcome is the fact (which we prove) that the linearized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
