Physics, Topology, Logic and Computation: A Rosetta Stone
John C. Baez, Mike Stay

TL;DR
This paper explores deep analogies between physics, topology, logic, and computation, using category theory to unify these fields and facilitate understanding without prior specialized knowledge.
Contribution
It provides a clear, accessible explanation of how closed symmetric monoidal categories connect concepts across physics, topology, logic, and computation.
Findings
Analogies between quantum physics and topology clarified
Category theory unifies diverse concepts across disciplines
Accessible exposition without prior specialized knowledge
Abstract
In physics, Feynman diagrams are used to reason about quantum processes. In the 1980s, it became clear that underlying these diagrams is a powerful analogy between quantum physics and topology: namely, a linear operator behaves very much like a "cobordism". Similar diagrams can be used to reason about logic, where they represent proofs, and computation, where they represent programs. With the rise of interest in quantum cryptography and quantum computation, it became clear that there is extensive network of analogies between physics, topology, logic and computation. In this expository paper, we make some of these analogies precise using the concept of "closed symmetric monoidal category". We assume no prior knowledge of category theory, proof theory or computer science.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
