Comment on "Nature of the high-pressure tricritical point in MnSi"
Sergei M. Stishov

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study on MnSi, clarifying a misinterpretation of the Landau expansion terms that led to unsupported conclusions about its phase diagram.
Contribution
It clarifies the correct interpretation of the Landau expansion in analyzing MnSi's phase diagram, correcting prior misidentification of key coefficients.
Findings
Corrected the interpretation of the Landau expansion terms
Disputed previous conclusions about MnSi's phase diagram
Highlighted the importance of proper coefficient identification in phase analysis
Abstract
It is argued that M. Otero-Leal et al. [PRB 79, 060401 (2009) [1] wrongly identified the second order term of the Arrott equation with the coefficient at the quartic term of the Landau expansion, therefore deriving absolutely unsupported conclusions on the phase diagram of MnSi.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
