Differences in the high-energy kink between hole- and electron-doped high-$T_{\rm c}$ superconductors
M. Ikeda, T. Yoshida, A. Fujimori, M. Kubota, K. Ono, Y. Kaga, T., Sasagawa, and H. Takagi

TL;DR
This study uses ARPES to compare the high-energy kink in electron-doped and hole-doped high-$T_c$ superconductors, revealing differences in energy scale and their relation to the chemical potential and band structure.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of the high-energy kink in electron- and hole-doped superconductors, highlighting the influence of chemical potential differences.
Findings
The energy scale of the HEK is larger in NCCO than in hole-doped HTSCs.
The HEK position shifts approximately with the chemical potential difference.
Around $( ext{ extpi}, 0)$, the HEK coincides with the band bottom.
Abstract
We have performed an angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) study of NdCeCuO (NCCO) in order to elucidate the origin of the high-energy kink (HEK) observed in the high- superconductors (HTSCs). The energy scale of the HEK in NCCO is large compared with that in hole-doped HTSCs, consistent with previous ARPES studies. From measurement in a wide momentum region, we have demonstrated that between the hole- and electron-doped HTSCs the energy position of the HEK is shifted approximately by the amount of the chemical potential difference. Also, we have found that around the HEK nearly coincides with the band bottom while around the node the band reaches the incoherent region and the HEK appears at the boundary between the coherent and incoherent regions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
