Cosmological Constraints from the SDSS maxBCG Cluster Catalog
Eduardo Rozo, Risa H. Wechsler, Eli S. Rykoff, James T. Annis, Matthew, R. Becker, August E. Evrard, Joshua A. Frieman, Sarah M. Hansen, Jiangang, Hao, David E. Johnston, Benjamin P. Koester, Timothy A. McKay, Erin S., Sheldon, David H. Weinberg

TL;DR
This study uses SDSS maxBCG cluster data to constrain cosmological parameters, achieving results consistent with WMAP and X-ray studies, demonstrating the robustness of optical cluster surveys for cosmology.
Contribution
First to simultaneously constrain cosmology and the richness--mass relation using SDSS maxBCG cluster data with weak lensing measurements.
Findings
A8_8(\u03A9_m/0.25)^{0.41} = 0.832 \u00b1 0.033
Constraints are consistent with WMAP five-year data and X-ray cluster results.
Joint analysis improves precision of A8_8 and A9_m by nearly a factor of two.
Abstract
We use the abundance and weak lensing mass measurements of the SDSS maxBCG cluster catalog to simultaneously constrain cosmology and the richness--mass relation of the clusters. Assuming a flat \LambdaCDM cosmology, we find \sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.25)^{0.41} = 0.832\pm 0.033 after marginalization over all systematics. In common with previous studies, our error budget is dominated by systematic uncertainties, the primary two being the absolute mass scale of the weak lensing masses of the maxBCG clusters, and uncertainty in the scatter of the richness--mass relation. Our constraints are fully consistent with the WMAP five-year data, and in a joint analysis we find \sigma_8=0.807\pm 0.020 and \Omega_m=0.265\pm 0.016, an improvement of nearly a factor of two relative to WMAP5 alone. Our results are also in excellent agreement with and comparable in precision to the latest cosmological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
