Evolution of Cluster Red-Sequence Galaxies from redshift 0.8 to 0.4: ages, metallicities and morphologies
P. Sanchez-Blazquez, P. Jablonka, S. Noll, B. M. Poggianti, J., Moustakas, B. Milvang-Jensen, C. Halliday, A. Aragon-Salamanca, R. P. Saglia,, V. Desai, G. De Lucia, D. I. Clowe, R. Pello, G. Rudnick, L. Simard, S. D. M., White, D. Zaritsky

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of stellar populations and morphologies of red-sequence galaxies in clusters from redshift 0.75 to 0.45, revealing mass-dependent evolution and a gradual morphological transformation.
Contribution
It provides the largest spectroscopic analysis of red-sequence galaxies at these redshifts, showing how their properties evolve with mass and time, and how star formation quenching relates to morphological changes.
Findings
Massive galaxies follow passive evolution with high-redshift formation.
Less massive galaxies have extended star formation histories.
The fraction of early-type morphologies decreases by 20% from z=0.75 to 0.45.
Abstract
We present a comprehensive analysis of the stellar population properties (age, metallicity and the alpha-element enhancement [E/Fe]) and morphologies of red-sequence galaxies in 24 clusters and groups from z~0.75 to z~0.45. The dataset, consisting of 215 spectra drawn from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey, constitutes the largest spectroscopic sample at these redshifts for which such an analysis has been conducted. Analysis reveals that the evolution of the stellar population properties of red-sequence galaxies depend on their mass: while the properties of most massive are well described by passive evolution and high-redshift formation, the less massive galaxies require a more extended star formation history. We show that these scenarios reproduce the index-sigma relations as well as the galaxy colours. The two main results of this work are (1) the evolution of the line-strength indices…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
