Reply to "A note on the innocuous implications of a minimum length in quantum gravity" by P.H. Frampton
Cosimo Bambi, Katherine Freese

TL;DR
This paper is a direct response to P.H. Frampton's comment on previous work discussing the potentially problematic implications of a minimum length scale in quantum gravity, clarifying their original claims.
Contribution
The authors provide a rebuttal to Frampton's critique, defending their original analysis of the dangerous implications of a minimum length in quantum gravity.
Findings
Clarification of original arguments
Counter-arguments to Frampton's critique
Reaffirmation of potential issues with minimum length in quantum gravity
Abstract
We reply to the comment "A note on the innocuous implications of a minimum length in quantum gravity" by P.H. Frampton [Class. Quantum Grav. 26 (2009) 018001, arXiv:arXiv:0808.0283] on our paper "Dangerous implications of a minimum length in quantum gravity" [Class. Quantum Grav. 25 (2008) 195013, arXiv:0803.0749].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
