Large-scale non-Gaussian mass function and halo bias: tests on N-body simulations
M. Grossi (MPA), L. Verde (ICREA&ICE), C. Carbone (ICE), K. Dolag, (MPA), E. Branchini (Roma 3), F. Iannuzzi (Bologna), S. Matarrese (Padova),, L. Moscardini (Bologna)

TL;DR
This paper tests analytical models of non-Gaussian halo abundance and clustering against N-body simulations, finding good agreement with specific corrections, and highlights the robustness of halo bias as a probe of primordial non-Gaussianity.
Contribution
It calibrates and validates analytical formulas for non-Gaussian halo mass function and bias using N-body simulations, with specific correction factors identified.
Findings
Excellent agreement between simulations and predictions with corrections
Corrections involve factors of sqrt{q} and q in collapse threshold and bias
Non-Gaussian halo bias is a robust probe of primordial non-Gaussianity
Abstract
The description of the abundance and clustering of halos for non-Gaussian initial conditions has recently received renewed interest, motivated by the forthcoming large galaxy and cluster surveys, which can potentially yield constraints of order unity on the non-Gaussianity parameter f_{NL}. We present tests on N-body simulations of analytical formulae describing the halo abundance and clustering for non-Gaussian initial conditions. We calibrate the analytic non-Gaussian mass function of Matarrese et al.(2000) and LoVerde et al.(2008) and the analytic description of clustering of halos for non-Gaussian initial conditions on N-body simulations. We find excellent agreement between the simulations and the analytic predictions if we make the corrections delta_c --> delta_c X sqrt{q} and delta_c --> \delta_c X q where q ~ 0.75, in the density threshold for gravitational collapse and in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
