Comment on "Bell inequalities and quantum mechanics" by J. H. Eberly
Luiz Carlos Ryff

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Eberly's derivation of Bell inequalities, highlighting errors and clarifying the correct assumptions needed for their derivation, emphasizing the importance of rigorous logic in quantum foundations.
Contribution
It identifies specific errors in Eberly's derivation and clarifies the correct assumptions necessary for Bell inequalities, emphasizing the need for careful logical analysis.
Findings
Eberly's derivation contains an incorrect equation.
Eberly's approach does not use two-particle states or locality.
Violations of Bell's inequalities do not necessarily require entanglement in Eberly's framework.
Abstract
Errors in Eberly's derivation of several Bell inequalities are pointed out: (1) it is based on an equation that is incorrect; (2) it uses neither two-particle states nor locality to derive Bell's inequalities and; (3) it does not use entanglement to obtain violations of Bell's inequalities. Even leading and outstanding physicists -- as certainly is the case of Prof. Eberly -- sometimes make elementary mistakes, and this by no means diminishes the importance of their scientific contribution. In general, this is a consequence of an excessive attachment to an idea (nowadays it has become fashionable to be against realism). This shows the importance of trying to keep an open mind.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
