The Extremely Luminous Supernova 2006gy at Late Phase: Detection of Optical Emission from Supernova
Koji S. Kawabata, Masaomi Tanaka, Keiichi Maeda, Takashi Hattori,, Ken'ichi Nomoto, Nozomu Tominaga, and Masayuki Yamanaka

TL;DR
This study presents late-phase optical observations of supernova 2006gy, revealing peculiar spectral features, light curve behavior, and implications for the explosion's nickel mass and circumstellar interaction.
Contribution
It provides detailed late-time spectroscopy and photometry of SN 2006gy, highlighting its unique spectral lines and suggesting a large nickel mass and high-density ejecta.
Findings
SN 2006gy faded by ~3 mag from 200 to 400 days
Late spectrum shows intermediate width emission lines
Estimated nickel mass at least 3 solar masses
Abstract
We performed optical spectroscopy and photometry of SN 2006gy at late time, ~400 days after the explosion, with the Subaru/FOCAS in a good seeing condition. We found that the SN faded by ~3 mag from ~200 to ~400 days after the explosion (i.e., by ~5 mag from peak to ~400 days) in R band. The overall light curve is marginally consistent with the 56Ni heating model, although the flattening around 200 days suggests the optical flux declined more steeply between ~200 and ~400 days. The late time spectrum was quite peculiar among all types of SNe. It showed many intermediate width (~2000 km/s FWHM) emission lines, e.g., [Fe II], [Ca II], and Ca II. The absence of the broad [O I] 6300, 6364 line and weakness of [Fe II] and [Ca II] lines compared with Ca II IR triplet would be explained by a moderately high electron density in the line emitting region. This high density assumption seems to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
