A new search for distant radio galaxies in the Southern hemisphere -- III. Optical spectroscopy and analysis of the MRCR--SUMSS sample
J. J. Bryant, H. M. Johnston, J. W. Broderick, R. W. Hunstead, C. De, Breuck, B. M. Gaensler

TL;DR
This study compiles and analyzes a sample of ultra-steep-spectrum radio sources in the southern hemisphere to identify high-redshift radio galaxies, providing spectroscopic redshifts and insights into galaxy evolution and spectral properties.
Contribution
It presents optical spectroscopic data for 52 sources in the MRCR--SUMSS sample, expanding the understanding of high-redshift radio galaxy properties and their spectral and evolutionary characteristics.
Findings
36 galaxies with measured redshifts, 13 at z>2
Consistent K-z distribution with passive evolution models
Steep spectra are likely intrinsic, not due to k-correction
Abstract
We have compiled a sample of 234 ultra-steep-spectrum(USS)-selected radio sources in order to find high-redshift radio galaxies (HzRGs). The sample is in the southern sky at -40 deg < DEC < -30 deg which is the overlap region of the 408-MHz Revised Molonglo Reference Catalogue, 843-MHz Sydney University Molonglo Sky Survey (the MRCR--SUMSS sample) and the 1400-MHz NRAO VLA Sky Survey. This is the third in a series of papers on the MRCR--SUMSS sample. Here we present optical spectra from the ANU 2.3-m telescope, ESO New Technology Telescope and ESO Very Large Telescope for 52 of the identifications from Bryant et al. (2009, Paper II), yielding redshifts for 36 galaxies, 13 of which have z>2. We analyse the K-z distribution and compare 4-arcsec-aperture magnitudes with 64-kpc aperture magnitudes in several surveys from the literature; the MRCR--SUMSS sample is found to be consistent with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
