Partially-erupting prominences: a comparison between observations and model-predicted observables
D. Tripathi, S. E. Gibson, J. Qiu, L. Fletcher, R.Liu, H. Gilbert, H., E. Mason

TL;DR
This study compares observations of partially-erupting prominences with model predictions, confirming the PEFR model's ability to explain partial eruptions and associated CME phenomena through evidence of internal reconnection.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the PEFR model accurately explains partial prominence eruptions and predicts observable signatures confirmed by multi-wavelength observations.
Findings
PEFR model explains partial eruptions and predicts CME observables.
All studied prominences show evidence of internal reconnection.
Observable features like dimmings and X-ray cusps support the model.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate several partially-erupting prominences to study their relationship with other CME-associated phenomena and to compare these observations with observables predicted by a model of partially-expelled flux ropes (Gibson & Fan, 2006a, b). METHODS: We have studied 6 selected events with partially-erupting prominences using multi wavelength observations recorded by the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT), Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE), Mauna Loa Solar Observatory (MLSO), Big Bear Solar Observatory (BBSO) and soft X-ray telescope (SXT). The observational features associated with partially-erupting prominences were then compared with the predicted observables from the model. RESULTS: The partially-expelled-flux-rope (PEFR) model of Gibson & Fan (2006a, b) can explain the partial eruption of these prominences, and in addition predicts a variety of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
