The Greater Impact of Mergers on the Growth of Massive Galaxies: Implications for Mass Assembly and Evolution Since z~1
Kevin Bundy (1,2), Masataka Fukugita (3), Richard S. Ellis (4,5),, Thomas A. Targett (4), Sirio Belli (6), Tadayuki Kodama (7) ((1) U. of, Toronto, (2) UC Berkeley, (3) U. of Tokyo, (4) Caltech, (5) Oxford, (6) U. of, Bologna, (7) NAOJ)

TL;DR
This study investigates how galaxy mergers influence the growth and evolution of massive galaxies since redshift z~1, revealing that major mergers are more common in high-mass, red, early-type galaxies and contribute significantly to their mass assembly.
Contribution
It provides new observational evidence that major mergers predominantly affect massive, early-type galaxies and their role in galaxy evolution since z~1, highlighting the mass-dependent nature of merger activity.
Findings
Massive galaxies (>10^11 Msun) are more likely to have merging companions.
The pair fraction for potential major mergers remains low (~4%) up to z~1.2.
Major mergers contribute significantly to the growth of the most massive galaxies.
Abstract
Using deep infrared observations conducted with the MOIRCS on the Subaru Telescope in GOODS-N combined with public surveys in GOODS-S, we investigate the dependence on stellar mass, M_*, and galaxy type of the close pair fraction (5 kpc < r < 20 kpc) and implied merger rate. In common with some recent studies we find that the fraction of paired systems that could result in major mergers is low (~4%) and does not increase significantly with redshift to z~1.2, with (1+z)^{1.6 \pm 1.6}. Our key finding is that massive galaxies with M_* > 1E11 Msun are more likely to host merging companions than less massive systems (M_* ~ 1E10 Msun). We find evidence for a higher pair fraction for red, spheroidal hosts compared to blue, late-type systems, in line with expectations based on clustering at small scales. So-called "dry" mergers between early-type galaxies represent nearly 50% of close pairs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
