arXiv:0902.0988·cond-mat.str-el·November 13, 2009
Agterberg, Zheng, and Mukherjee Reply
D.F. Agterberg, Z. Zheng, and S. Mukherjee
TL;DR
This paper is a reply to a previous critique or discussion, clarifying or defending the authors' original work or viewpoints.
Contribution
It provides a response to Ikeda's critique, addressing specific points or disagreements raised in the prior publication.
Findings
01
Clarifies the authors' original arguments
02
Addresses specific critiques raised by Ikeda
03
Reinforces the validity of the original work
Abstract
Reply to Ikeda (arXiv:0712.3341).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.