Comparative Direct Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Spectra. V. Insights from A Larger Sample and Quantitative Subclassification
David Branch, Leeann Chau Dang, and E. Baron

TL;DR
This study extends the spectroscopic analysis of Type Ia supernovae, revealing new insights into their diversity, subclassification, and luminosity consistency using a larger sample and quantitative methods.
Contribution
It introduces a refined quantitative subclassification scheme for SNe Ia and challenges the notion of certain subgroups as physically distinct entities.
Findings
Extreme CL SN 1991bg-like are not a separate subgroup.
SN 1999aa-like SSs are numerous and similar, not a distinct subgroup.
Absolute magnitude dispersion among CNs is minimal.
Abstract
A comparative study of optical spectra of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) is extended, in the light of new data. The discussion is framed in terms of the four groups defined in previous papers of this series: core normal (CN); broad line (BL); cool (CL); and shallow silicon (SS). Emerging features of the SN Ia spectroscopic diversity include evidence (1) that extreme CL SN 1991bg-likes are not a physically distinct subgroup and (2) for the existence of a substantial number of SN 1999aa-like SSs that are very similar to each other and distinguishable from CN even as late as three weeks after maximum light. SN 1999aa-likes may be relatively numerous, yet not a physically distinct subgroup. The efficacy of quantitative spectroscopic subclassification of SNe Ia based on the equivalent widths of absorption features near 5750 A and 6100 A near maximum light is discussed. The absolute magnitude…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
