Volume and topology of bounded and closed hyperbolic 3-manifolds
Jason DeBlois, Peter B. Shalen

TL;DR
This paper establishes volume lower bounds for certain hyperbolic 3-manifolds based on topological properties like genus and homology, using a dichotomy involving return paths and embedded submanifolds.
Contribution
It introduces new volume bounds for hyperbolic 3-manifolds with specified boundary and homological conditions, employing a novel dichotomy approach.
Findings
Manifolds with genus ≥ 5 have volume > 6.89
Manifolds with certain homology conditions have volume > 3.44
Dichotomy involving return paths and embedded submanifolds
Abstract
Let N be a compact, orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold with connected, totally geodesic boundary of genus 2. If N has Heegaard genus at least 5, then its volume is greater than 6.89. The proof of this result uses the following dichotomy: either N has a long return path (defined by Kojima-Miyamoto), or N has an embedded, codimension-0 submanifold X with incompressible boundary , where T is the frontier of X in N, which is not a book of I-bundles. As an application of this result, we show that if M is a closed, orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold such that H_1(M;Z_2) has dimension at least 5, and if the image in H^2(M;Z_2) of the cup product map has image of dimension at most 1, then M has volume greater than 3.44.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
