Efficiency of Magnetic to Kinetic Energy Conversion in a Monopole Magnetosphere
Alexander Tchekhovskoy (1), Jonathan C. McKinney (2), Ramesh Narayan, (1) ((1) Harvard-CfA, (2) Department of Physics, Kavli Institute for, Particle Astrophysics, Cosmology, Stanford University)

TL;DR
This study uses relativistic MHD simulations to demonstrate that magnetic energy can be efficiently converted into kinetic energy in monopole magnetospheres, producing highly relativistic jets relevant to gamma-ray bursts.
Contribution
It provides the first steady-state simulation showing efficient magnetic to kinetic energy conversion in monopole geometries, challenging previous assumptions about their inefficiency.
Findings
Jets achieve Lorentz factors around 200.
Magnetic energy converts efficiently into kinetic energy.
Jets are collimated with narrow opening angles (~0.03 rad).
Abstract
Unconfined relativistic outflows from rotating, magnetized compact objects are often well-modeled by assuming the field geometry is approximately a split-monopole at large radii. Earlier work has indicated that such an unconfined flow has an inefficient conversion of magnetic energy to kinetic energy. This has led to the conclusion that ideal magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) processes fail to explain observations of, e.g., the Crab pulsar wind at large radii where energy conversion appears efficient. In addition, as a model for astrophysical jets, the monopole field geometry has been abandoned in favor of externally confined jets since the latter appeared to be generically more efficient jet accelerators. We perform time-dependent axisymmetric relativistic MHD simulations in order to find steady state solutions for a wind from a compact object endowed with a monopole field geometry. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
