Stability of Relativistic Force-Free Jets
Ramesh Narayan (1), Jason Li (2), Alexander Tchekhovskoy (1) ((1), Harvard-CfA, (2) Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University)

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the stability of relativistic force-free jets, finding that jets with monotonically increasing Lorentz factor profiles are stable, while those with a maximum Lorentz factor at an intermediate radius are unstable, with specific growth rates for kink instabilities.
Contribution
It introduces a stability analysis of cylindrical force-free jet equilibria, identifying conditions for stability and instability, and quantifies growth rates of kink modes in relativistic jets.
Findings
Monotonically increasing (R) profiles are stable.
Profiles with a maximum (R) are unstable.
Kink instability growth rate is approximately 0.4/_j times c/R_j.
Abstract
We consider a two-parameter family of cylindrical force-free equilibria, modeled to match numerical simulations of relativistic force-free jets. We study the linear stability of these equilibria, assuming a rigid impenetrable wall at the outer cylindrical radius R_j. We find that equilibria in which the Lorentz factor \gamma(R) increases monotonically with increasing radius R are stable. On the other hand, equilibria in which \gamma(R) reaches a maximum value at an intermediate radius and then declines to a smaller value \gamma_j at R_j are unstable. The most rapidly growing mode is an m=1 kink instability which has a growth rate ~ (0.4 / \gamma_j) (c/R_j). The e-folding length of the equivalent convected instability is ~2.5 \gamma_j R_j. For a typical jet with an opening angle \theta_j ~ few / \gamma_j, the mode amplitude grows weakly with increasing distance from the base of the jet,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
