TL;DR
This paper critiques the common interpretation that Bell inequality violations imply a choice between nonlocality and non-realism, highlighting the ambiguity of the term 'non-realism' in quantum physics.
Contribution
It clarifies the conceptual confusion surrounding non-realism in Bell inequality discussions and questions the necessity of choosing between nonlocality and non-realism.
Findings
Highlights vagueness of 'non-realism' in quantum interpretations
Challenges the dichotomy between nonlocality and non-realism
Encourages clearer conceptual analysis in quantum foundations
Abstract
The claim that the observation of a violation of a Bell inequality leads to an alleged alternative between nonlocality and non-realism is annoying because of the vagueness of the second term.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.