Turbulence in a three-dimensional deflagration model for Type Ia supernovae: I. Scaling properties
F. Ciaraldi-Schoolmann (1), W. Schmidt (1), J. C. Niemeyer (1), F. K., Roepke (2), W. Hillebrandt (2) ((1) Lehrstuhl f\"ur Astronomie und, Astrophysik, Universit\"at W\"urzburg, Germany, (2) Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur, Astrophysik, Garching, Germany)

TL;DR
This study investigates the turbulent velocity field in a 3D deflagration model of Type Ia supernovae, confirming isotropy at small scales and the need for subgrid-scale models for accurate flame speed calculations.
Contribution
It provides detailed analysis of turbulence scaling properties in supernova models, validating the use of isotropic assumptions and subgrid models at unresolved scales.
Findings
Turbulence is isotropic at small scales
Scaling follows Kolmogorov theory until fuel is burned
Anisotropy appears at larger scales due to Rayleigh-Taylor instability
Abstract
We analyze the statistical properties of the turbulent velocity field in the deflagration model for Type Ia supernovae. In particular, we consider the question of whether turbulence is isotropic and consistent with the Kolmogorov theory at small length scales. Using numerical data from a high-resolution simulation of a thermonuclear supernova explosion, spectra of the turbulence energy and velocity structure functions are computed. We show that the turbulent velocity field is isotropic at small length scales and follows a scaling law that is consistent with the Kolmogorov theory until most of the nuclear fuel is burned. At length scales greater than a certain characteristic scale, turbulence becomes anisotropic. Here, the radial velocity fluctuations follow the scaling law of the Rayleigh-Taylor instability, whereas the angular component still obeys Kolmogorov scaling. In the late phase…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
