On the Recovery of the Star Formation History of the LMC from the VISTA Survey of the Magellanic System
L. Kerber (1,2), L. Girardi (1), S. Rubele (1,3), M.-R. Cioni (4) ((1), Oss. Astron. Padova, Italy, (2) IAG-USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil, (3) Dip. Astron., Padova, Italy, (4) University of Hertfordshire, UK)

TL;DR
This study assesses the accuracy of recovering the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud using simulated VISTA survey data, demonstrating that reliable results are achievable with specific spatial resolutions and accounting for uncertainties.
Contribution
It introduces a simulation-based method to evaluate the expected accuracy of SFH recovery from VISTA survey data for the LMC, including error analysis and effects of unknown parameters.
Findings
Random errors in SFR(t) are below 20% for ages >0.4 Gyr at 0.1 sqdeg resolution.
SFH recovery remains accurate even when the AMR is unknown, with increased errors by a factor of 2.5.
Systematic errors due to distance and reddening are below 30%.
Abstract
The VISTA near infrared survey of the Magellanic System (VMC) will provide deep YJKs photometry reaching stars in the oldest turn-off point all over the Magellanic Clouds (MCs). As part of the preparation for the survey, we aim to access the accuracy in the Star Formation History (SFH) that can be expected from VMC data, in particular for the LMC. To this aim, we first simulate VMC images containing not only the LMC stellar populations but also the foreground MW stars and background galaxies. We perform aperture photometry over these simulated images, access the expected levels of photometric errors and incompleteness, and apply the classical technique of SFH-recovery based on the reconstruction of colour-magnitude diagrams (CMD) via the minimization of a chi-squared-like statistics. We then evaluate the expected errors in the recovered star formation rate as a function of stellar age,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
