Revisiting the Age of Enlightenment from a Collective Decision Making Systems Perspective

TL;DR

This paper explores how modern social algorithms inspired by Enlightenment thinkers can enhance democratic decision-making in the Information Age.

Contribution

It introduces a framework for applying Enlightenment-era social algorithms within contemporary techno-social systems to improve democratic processes.

Findings

Social algorithms can better realize Enlightenment ideals with modern technology.

Revisiting Enlightenment principles can inform better decision-making systems.

The approach integrates historical social theories with current digital platforms.

Abstract

The ideals of the eighteenth century's Age of Enlightenment are the foundation of modern democracies. The era was characterized by thinkers who promoted progressive social reforms that opposed the long-established aristocracies and monarchies of the time. Prominent examples of such reforms include the establishment of inalienable human rights, self-governing republics, and market capitalism. Twenty-first century democratic nations can benefit from revisiting the systems developed during the Enlightenment and reframing them within the techno-social context of the Information Age. This article explores the application of social algorithms that make use of Thomas Paine's (English: 1737--1809) representatives, Adam Smith's (Scottish: 1723--1790) self-interested actors, and Marquis de Condorcet's (French: 1743--1794) optimal decision making groups. It is posited that technology-enabled social algorithms can better realize the ideals articulated during the Enlightenment.