
TL;DR
This paper reviews and critiques ten different proofs of the Generalized Second Law of Thermodynamics, offering new insights and strategies for future, more comprehensive proofs, while discussing foundational choices and regimes in the theory.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of existing proofs of the GSL and introduces new perspectives and strategies for developing more complete proofs.
Findings
Identifies limitations in current proofs of the GSL
Proposes new strategies for future proofs
Clarifies definitions of regimes and foundational choices
Abstract
Ten attempts to prove the Generalized Second Law of Thermodyanmics (GSL) are described and critiqued. Each proof provides valuable insights which should be useful for constructing future, more complete proofs. Rather than merely summarizing previous research, this review offers new perspectives, and strategies for overcoming limitations of the existing proofs. A long introductory section addresses some choices that must be made in any formulation the GSL: Should one use the Gibbs or the Boltzmann entropy? Should one use the global or the apparent horizon? Is it necessary to assume any entropy bounds? If the area has quantum fluctuations, should the GSL apply to the average area? The definition and implications of the classical, hydrodynamic, semiclassical and full quantum gravity regimes are also discussed. A lack of agreement regarding how to define the "quasi-stationary" regime is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
