The XMM-Newton long look of NGC 1365: lack of a high/soft state in its ultraluminous X-ray sources
Roberto Soria (MSSL-UCL), Guido Risaliti (Harvard CfA & INAF Arcetri),, Martin Elvis (Harvard CfA), Giuseppina Fabbiano (Harvard CfA), Stefano, Bianchi (Univ. Roma 3), Zdenka Kuncic (Sydney Uni)

TL;DR
This study analyzes a long XMM-Newton observation of NGC 1365, revealing that its ultraluminous X-ray sources do not exhibit the typical high/soft state, suggesting different accretion behaviors from stellar-mass black holes.
Contribution
It provides detailed spectral and timing analysis of ULXs in NGC 1365, highlighting the absence of a high/soft state and proposing alternative accretion scenarios.
Findings
ULXs remained in a hard power-law spectral state during observations.
They have never been observed in a high/soft state like stellar-mass black holes.
Persistent super-Eddington accretion may prevent standard disk formation.
Abstract
Based on our long (~ 300 ks) 2007 XMM-Newton observation of the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1365, we report here on the spectral and timing behaviour of two ultraluminous X-ray sources, which had previously reached isotropic X-ray luminosities L_X ~ 4 x 10^{40} erg/s (0.3-10 keV band). In 2007, they were in a lower state (L_X ~ 5 x 10^{39} erg/s, and L_X ~ 1.5 x 10^{39} erg/s for X1 and X2, respectively). Their X-ray spectra were dominated by power-laws with photon indices Gamma ~ 1.8 and Gamma ~ 1.2, respectively. Thus, their spectra were similar to those at their outburst peaks. Both sources have been seen to vary by a factor of 20 in luminosity over the years, but their spectra are always dominated by a hard power-law; unlike most stellar-mass BHs, they have never been found in a canonical high/soft state dominated by a standard disk. The lack of a canonical high/soft state seems to be a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
