Having cut-points is not a Whitney reversible property
Eiichi Matsuhashi

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the property of having cut-points in a topological space is not preserved under Whitney reversible transformations, answering a previously open question in topology.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample showing that having cut-points is not a Whitney reversible property, resolving a question posed by Illanes and Nadler.
Findings
Having cut-points is not Whitney reversible.
Counterexample to Whitney reversibility of cut-points.
Answers an open question in topology.
Abstract
We show that the property of having cut-points is not a Whitney reversible property. This answers in the negative a question posed by Illanes and Nadler.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
