VLT/NACO near-infrared observations of the transient radio magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408

TL;DR

This study conducted deep near-infrared observations of the transient radio magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408 to identify its potential counterpart, but no definitive candidate was confirmed due to limited variability and non-detections.

Contribution

First deep near-infrared imaging of 1E 1547.0-5408 with VLT aimed at identifying its counterpart, providing upper limits and candidate analysis.

Findings

Detected four objects near the radio position.

Object 1 has a faint magnitude with low flux ratio.

No definitive NIR counterpart was identified.

Abstract

Despite about a decade of observations, very little is known about the optical and infrared (IR) emission properties of the Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters (SGRs) and of the Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXPs), the magnetar candidates, and about the physical processes which drive their emission at these wavelengths. This is mainly due to the limited number of identifications achieved so far, five in total, and to the sparse spectral coverage obtained from multi-band optical/IR photometry. Aim of this work is to search for a likely candidate counterpart to the recently discovered transient radio AXP 1E 1547.0-5408. We performed the first deep near-IR (NIR) observations (Ks band) of 1E 1547.0-5408 with the VLT on three nights (July 8th, 12th, and August 17th), after the X-ray source rebrightening and during the subsequent decay reported around June 2007. We detected four objects within, or close to, the 3sigma radio position of 1E 1547.0-5408. The faintest of them (object 1) has a brightness K = 20.27 +/- 0.05, which would yield an unabsorbed X-ray to NIR flux ratio FX/FKs ~ 800 for 1E 1547.0-5408, i.e. on average lower than those derived for other magnetars. The non-detection of object 1 on the nights of July 8th and August 17th only allowed us to set an upper limit of Delta Ks ~ 0.2 on its NIR variability, which prevented us to search for correlations with the radio or X-ray flux. We detected no other object at the radio position down to a limit of Ks ~ 21.7 (at 5sigma), computed in our deepest VLT image (July 12th). From our observations we can not confidently propose a NIR counterpart to 1E 1547.0-5408. More NIR observations of object 1, e.g. to determine its colors and to monitor variability, would be conclusive to determine whether or not it can be considered a plausible candidate.