Black Hole Masses of Intermediate-Redshift Quasars: Near Infrared Spectroscopy
Matthias Dietrich (The Ohio State University), Smita Mathur (The Ohio, State University), Dirk Grupe (Penn State University), S. Komossa (MPI fuer, extraterretrische Physik, Garching)

TL;DR
This study measures black hole masses in intermediate-redshift quasars using near-infrared spectra, revealing their growth history, accretion rates, and gas metallicity, and comparing different emission line diagnostics.
Contribution
First near-infrared spectroscopic measurements of black hole masses in intermediate-redshift quasars, combining multiple emission lines and analyzing growth and metallicity.
Findings
Black hole masses range from ~2x10^9 to 10^10 solar masses.
Black holes could not have grown solely by radiatively efficient accretion from small seeds.
Gas metallicity in the broad-line region is about three times solar.
Abstract
We present near-infrared spectra of ten luminous, intermediate redshift quasars observed with SofI at the NTT of ESO/La Silla. With these rest-frame optical spectra we probe the Hb -[OIII] emission line region. Using the standard scaling relation involving the width of the Hb line and the continuum luminosity, we measure black hole masses in the range of ~2x10^9 to 10^10 Msol. We also used SDSS spectra to probe MgII2798 and CIV1549 emission lines and used these for black hole mass measurements as well. The massive black holes we observe could not have grown by simple radiatively efficient accretion at the observed accretion rate starting from seeds of up to thousand solar masses. About 10% of the observed black hole mass must have been accumulated by earlier merger events and radiatively inefficient accretion. Radiatively efficient accretion would further grow these BHs to masses of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
