Standard and non-standard metarefraction with confocal lenslet arrays
Johannes Courtial

TL;DR
This paper investigates the optical properties and limitations of confocal lenslet arrays, focusing on standard and non-standard metarefraction, and analyzes how non-corresponding lenslet paths affect field of view.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of field-of-view limitations caused by non-corresponding lenslet paths in confocal lenslet arrays, extending previous models.
Findings
Non-corresponding lenslet paths cause ghost images and field-of-view restrictions.
Quantitative analysis of field-of-view limitations is presented.
Conditions for minimizing non-standard metarefraction effects are discussed.
Abstract
A recent paper demonstrated that two lenslet arrays with focal lengths f_1 and f_2, separated by f_1 + f_2, change the direction of transmitted light rays approximately like the interface between isotropic media with refractive indices n_1 and n_2, where n_1 / n_2 = - f_1 / f_2 [J. Courtial, New J. Phys. 10, 083033 (2008)]. This is true if light passes through corresponding lenslets, that is lenslets that share an optical axis. Light can also pass through different combinations of non-corresponding lenslets. Such light can be either absorbed or allowed to form "ghost images"; either way, it leads to a limitation of the field of view of confocal lenslet arrays. This paper describes, qualitatively and quantitatively, a number of such field-of-view limitations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
