Interpreting the yield of transit surveys: Are there groups in the known transiting planets population?

TL;DR

This study uses simulations to analyze known transiting planets, confirming some correlations and questioning the statistical significance of the proposed two-planet groups, suggesting a continuous distribution.

Contribution

The paper introduces a simulation-based approach to test the statistical significance of observed correlations and classifications among transiting planets.

Findings

Mass-period correlation is confirmed in transiting planets.

Surface gravity and period correlation is naturally explained by the model.

Apparent bimodal Safronov number distribution is not statistically significant.

Abstract

Each transiting planet discovered is characterized by 7 measurable quantities, that may or may not be linked together (planet mass, radius, orbital period, and star mass, radius, effective temperature, and metallicity). Correlations between planet mass and period, surface gravity and period, planet radius and star temperature have been previously observed among the known transiting giant planets. Two classes of planets have been previously identified based on their Safronov number. We use the CoRoTlux code to compare simulated events to the sample of discovered planets and test the statistical significance of these correlations. We first generate a stellar field with planetary companions based on radial velocity discoveries and a planetary evolution model, then apply a detection criterion that includes both statistical and red noise sources. We compare the yield of our simulated survey with the ensemble of 31 well-characterized giant transiting planets, using a multivariate logistic analysis to assess whether the simulated distribution matches the known transiting planets. Our multivariate analysis shows that our simulated sample and observations are consistent to 76%. The mass vs. period correlation for giant planets first observed with radial velocity holds with transiting planets. Our model naturally explains the correlation between planet surface gravity and period and the one between planet radius and stellar effective temperature. Finally, we are also able to reproduce the previously observed apparent bimodal distribution of Safronov numbers in 10% of our simulated cases, although our model predicts a continuous distribution. This shows that the evidence for the existence of two groups of planets with different intrinsic properties is not statistically significant.