Indirect Dark Matter Signals from EGRET and PAMELA compared
W. de Boer (Univ. of Karlsruhe, Germany)

TL;DR
This paper compares gamma-ray and antimatter signals from dark matter annihilation, highlighting the impact of Galactic propagation models, especially convection, on interpreting PAMELA and EGRET data, and finds that DMA can explain antiprotons but not the positron excess.
Contribution
It demonstrates that anisotropic propagation models with convection are necessary to interpret cosmic ray data and shows that dark matter annihilation can account for antiproton excess but not the positron rise observed by PAMELA.
Findings
EGRET gamma-ray excess consistent with DMA
Convection affects charged particle yields significantly
DMA explains antiproton excess but not positron rise
Abstract
Dark Matter annihilation (DMA) may yield an excess of gamma rays and antimatter particles, like antiprotons and positrons, above the background from cosmic ray interactions. The excess of diffuse Galactic Gamma Rays from EGRET shows all the features expected from DMA. The new precise measurements of the antiproton and positron fractions from PAMELA are compared with the EGRET excess. It is shown that the charged particles are strongly dependent on the propagation model used. The usual propagation models with isotropic propagation models are incompatible with the recently observed convection in our Galaxy. Convection leads to an order of magnitude uncertainty in the yield of charged particles from DMA, since even a rather small convection will let drift the charged particles in the halo to outer space. It is shown that such anisotropic propagation models including convection prefer a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
