The Samurai Project: verifying the consistency of black-hole-binary waveforms for gravitational-wave detection
Mark Hannam, Sascha Husa, John G. Baker, Michael Boyle, Bernd, Bruegmann, Tony Chu, Nils Dorband, Frank Herrmann, Ian Hinder, Bernard J., Kelly, Lawrence E. Kidder, Pablo Laguna, Keith D. Matthews, James R. van, Meter, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Denis Pollney, Christian Reisswig

TL;DR
This paper assesses the consistency of numerical relativity black-hole-binary waveforms across different codes, demonstrating their high agreement and suitability for gravitational-wave detection in current and future observatories.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of waveforms from five numerical codes, establishing their agreement and validating their use in gravitational-wave searches.
Findings
Waveform phase and amplitude agree within uncertainties.
Mismatch is below 10^{-3} for certain mass ranges.
Waveforms are indistinguishable at typical detection SNRs.
Abstract
We quantify the consistency of numerical-relativity black-hole-binary waveforms for use in gravitational-wave (GW) searches with current and planned ground-based detectors. We compare previously published results for the mode of the gravitational waves from an equal-mass nonspinning binary, calculated by five numerical codes. We focus on the 1000M (about six orbits, or 12 GW cycles) before the peak of the GW amplitude and the subsequent ringdown. We find that the phase and amplitude agree within each code's uncertainty estimates. The mismatch between the modes is better than for binary masses above with respect to the Enhanced LIGO detector noise curve, and for masses above with respect to Advanced LIGO, Virgo and Advanced Virgo. Between the waveforms with the best agreement, the mismatch is below $2 \times…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
