The unusual X-ray light-curve of GRB 080307: the onset of the afterglow?
K.L. Page (1), R. Willingale (1), P.T. O'Brien (1), N.R. Tanvir (1),, J.P. Osborne (1), B. Zhang (2), S.T. Holland (3,4), A.J. Levan (5), A., Melandri (6), R.L.C. Starling (1), D. Bersier (6), D.N. Burrows (7), J.E., Geach (8), P. Maxted (9) ((1) University of Leicester

TL;DR
This paper analyzes an unusual X-ray light-curve feature in GRB 080307, suggesting it may represent the onset of the afterglow, a rare observation in Swift data, or an alternative flare phenomenon.
Contribution
It introduces a two-component model to interpret the early X-ray emission as the afterglow onset, a rarely observed feature in Swift GRB light-curves.
Findings
The X-ray hump is longer and smoother than typical early flares.
The emission can be modeled as the onset of the afterglow.
Alternative explanations include a slow flare or reverse shock effects.
Abstract
Swift-detected GRB 080307 showed an unusual smooth rise in its X-ray light-curve around 100 seconds after the burst, at the start of which the emission briefly softened. This `hump' has a longer duration than is normal for a flare at early times and does not demonstrate a typical flare profile. Using a two component power-law-to-exponential model, the rising emission can be modelled as the onset of the afterglow, something which is very rarely seen in Swift-X-ray light-curves. We cannot, however, rule out that the hump is a particularly slow early-time flare, or that it is caused by upscattered reverse shock electrons.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
