Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III: Results for the 2002--2007 data-taking period
SAGE Collaboration: J. N. Abdurashitov, V. N. Gavrin, V. V. Gorbachev,, P. P. Gurkina, T. V. Ibragimova, A. V. Kalikhov, N. G. Khairnasov, T. V., Knodel, I. N. Mirmov, A. A. Shikhin, E. P. Veretenkin, V. E. Yants, G. T., Zatsepin, T. J. Bowles, S. R. Elliott, W. A. Teasdale

TL;DR
This paper reports on the measurement of solar neutrino capture rates using gallium from 2002 to 2007, confirming consistency with solar models and neutrino oscillation theories, and discusses experimental improvements and neutrino source tests.
Contribution
It provides updated measurements of solar neutrino capture rates with gallium, including experimental improvements and analysis of neutrino source tests, supporting the standard solar model and neutrino oscillation hypotheses.
Findings
Measured capture rate of 65.4 SNU with uncertainties.
Combined gallium experiments yield a rate of 66.1 SNU.
Observed to predicted neutrino rate ratio of 0.87 +/- 0.05.
Abstract
The Russian-American experiment SAGE began to measure the solar neutrino capture rate with a target of gallium metal in Dec. 1989. Measurements have continued with only a few brief interruptions since that time. We give here the experimental improvements in SAGE since its last published data summary in Dec. 2001. Assuming the solar neutrino production rate was constant during the period of data collection, combined analysis of 168 extractions through Dec. 2007 gives a capture rate of solar neutrinos with energy more than 233 keV of 65.4 (+3.1)(-3.0) (stat) (+2.6)(-2.8) (syst) SNU. The weighted average of the results of all three Ga solar neutrino experiments, SAGE, Gallex, and GNO, is now 66.1 +/- 3.1 SNU, where statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined in quadrature. During the recent period of data collection a new test of SAGE was made with a reactor-produced 37Ar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
