A Critique of the relativistic cosmology
R. K. Thakur

TL;DR
This paper critically examines relativistic cosmological models, questioning the assumption of expanding 3-space and highlighting the lack of observational evidence, which could undermine the foundational geometry of these models.
Contribution
It challenges the prevailing view of an expanding 3-space in relativistic cosmology, proposing that this assumption may be unfounded and based on potentially flawed theoretical foundations.
Findings
No observational evidence for 3-space expansion
Questioning the validity of Riemannian geometry in cosmology
Potential flaws in the foundation of relativistic models
Abstract
All the relativistic cosmological models of the universe, except Einstein's static model, imply that the 3-space of the spacetime of the universe is also expanding apart from the matter and the radiation in it. However, there is no observational evidence of the expansion of the 3-space of the spacetime of the universe. Actually, the 3-space of the spacetime of the universe might not be expanding at all. Consequently, the conceptual foundation of the relativistic cosmological models of the universe based on the general theory of relativity, which in turn is based on Riemannian geometry, might be faulty and misleading.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory
