Triple linking numbers, ambiguous Hopf invariants and integral formulas for three-component links
Dennis DeTurck, Herman Gluck, Rafal Komendarczyk, Paul Melvin, Clayton, Shonkwiler, David Shea Vela-Vick

TL;DR
This paper links Milnor's triple linking number for three-component links to Pontryagin's homotopy invariants via characteristic maps, providing explicit integral formulas and clarifying their geometric and algebraic relationships.
Contribution
It establishes a geometric interpretation of Milnor's triple linking number using characteristic maps and integral formulas, connecting link invariants to homotopy invariants of maps from the 3-torus to the 2-sphere.
Findings
Milnor's mu-invariant equals Pontryagin's nu-invariant divided by two.
Pairwise linking numbers correspond to degrees of characteristic map restrictions.
Explicit integral formulas for the invariants are derived using Fourier series and Laplacian solutions.
Abstract
Three-component links in the 3-dimensional sphere were classified up to link homotopy by John Milnor in his senior thesis, published in 1954. A complete set of invariants is given by the pairwise linking numbers p, q and r of the components, and by the residue class of one further integer mu, the "triple linking number" of the title, which is well-defined modulo the greatest common divisor of p, q and r. To each such link L we associate a geometrically natural characteristic map g_L from the 3-torus to the 2-sphere in such a way that link homotopies of L become homotopies of g_L. Maps of the 3-torus to the 2-sphere were classified up to homotopy by Lev Pontryagin in 1941. A complete set of invariants is given by the degrees p, q and r of their restrictions to the 2-dimensional coordinate subtori, and by the residue class of one further integer nu, an "ambiguous Hopf invariant" which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
