NLS1 galaxies and estimation of their central black hole masses from the X-ray excess variance method
Marek Nikolajuk (1), Bozena Czerny (2), Pawel Gurynowicz (1) ((1), Faculty of Physics, Univ. of Bialystok, Poland,(2) N.Copernicus Astronomical, Center, Poland)

TL;DR
This paper extends the X-ray excess variance method for black hole mass estimation from broad line Seyfert 1 galaxies to Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxies, revealing the need for different scaling factors and spectral considerations.
Contribution
It introduces a modified mass estimation approach for NLS1 galaxies and highlights the importance of soft X-ray spectral properties in classification.
Findings
A single scaling coefficient works for most NLS1s, increasing mass estimates by a factor of 20.
Some NLS1 galaxies with intermediate variability and harder X-ray spectra challenge the simple classification.
Soft X-ray slope may be a better classification criterion than Hbeta line width.
Abstract
Black hole mass determination in active galaxies is a key issue in understanding various luminosity states. In the present paper we try to generalise the mass determination method based on the X-ray excess variance, successfully used for typical broad line Seyfert 1 galaxies (BLS1) to Narrow Line Seyfert 1 (NLS1) galaxies. NLS1 galaxies differ from BLS1 with respect to several properties. They are generally more variable in 2-10 keV energy band so the natural expectation is the need to use a different scaling coefficient between the mass and the variance in these two types of sources. However, we find that such a simple approach is not enough. Although for majority of the 21 NLS1 galaxies in our sample a single scaling coefficient (larger by a factor 20) provided us with a satisfactory method of mass determination, in a small subset of NLS1 galaxies this approach failed. Variability of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
