Internal network dynamics prolong a losing battle
Zhenyuan Zhao, Juan Camilo Bohorquez, Alex Dixon, Neil F. Johnson

TL;DR
This paper reveals that internal network dynamics can prolong the survival of a minority group in a fight-to-the-death scenario, contrary to traditional mass action theory, with implications for medical and social interventions.
Contribution
It introduces an analytic theory demonstrating how internal network dynamics can extend the duration of losing battles, challenging conventional wisdom.
Findings
Internal network dynamics can prolong minority survival.
The theory explains previously unexplained data.
Interventions can modify battle durations.
Abstract
Fights-to-the-death occur in many natural, medical and commercial settings. Standard mass action theory and conventional wisdom imply that the minority (i.e. smaller) group's survival time decreases as its relative initial size decreases, in the absence of replenishment. Here we show that the opposite actually happens, if the minority group features internal network dynamics. Our analytic theory provides a unified quantitative explanation for a range of previously unexplained data, and predicts how losing battles in a medical or social context might be extended or shortened using third-party intervention.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Decision Making
