What is the Shape Effect on the (Hyper)polarizabilities? A Comparison Study on the Moebius, Cyclic, and Linear Nitrogen-Substituted Polyacenes
H.L. Xu, Z.R. Li, F.F. Wang, D. Wu, Kikuo Harigaya, F.L. Gu

TL;DR
This study compares how the shape of nitrogen-substituted polyacenes, specifically Moebius, cyclic, and linear forms, affects their static polarizability and hyperpolarizability, revealing significant shape-dependent variations.
Contribution
It provides the first comparative analysis of shape effects on (hyper)polarizabilities using MP2 calculations for nitrogen-substituted polyacenes.
Findings
Opening the knot increases alpha_0 from 268 to 323 au.
Cyclic to linear increases beta_0 from 1049 to 2814 au.
Shape changes explain variations in (hyper)polarizabilities.
Abstract
How does the framework shape influence the static polarizability (alpha_0) and the first hyperpolarizability (beta_0)? This work, for the first time, presents a comparison study at the MP2/6-31+G(d) level, by using the nitrogen-substituted polyacenes as models: the Moebius strip with a knot, the cyclic strip without knot, and the linear strip. Opening the knot of the Moebius strip to form the cyclic strip, it leads to the increase of the alpha_0 from 268 au to 323 au and the beta_0 value increases about three times from 393 (Moebius) to 1049 au (cyclic). Further, opening the cyclic strip to form the linear strip, the alpha_0 value increases from 323 au to 476 au. While the beta_0 value as well increases about three times from 1049 (cyclic) to 2814 au (linear). The changes in the static (hyper)polarizabilities are well explained by the geometrical differences among the Moebius, cyclic,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
