Highly Undecidable Problems For Infinite Computations
Olivier Finkel (ELM, Lip)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that many classical decision problems related to infinite computations, such as universality and equivalence, are highly undecidable, residing at the second level of the analytical hierarchy, even for simple automata.
Contribution
It establishes the $oldsymbol{ ext{Pi}}_2^1$-completeness of key decision problems for 1-counter omega-languages and related models, revealing their high undecidability.
Findings
Many decision problems are $oldsymbol{ ext{Pi}}_2^1$-complete.
Problems include universality, inclusion, equivalence, and determinizability.
Results apply to simple automata like 1-counter and 2-tape automata.
Abstract
We show that many classical decision problems about 1-counter omega-languages, context free omega-languages, or infinitary rational relations, are -complete, hence located at the second level of the analytical hierarchy, and "highly undecidable". In particular, the universality problem, the inclusion problem, the equivalence problem, the determinizability problem, the complementability problem, and the unambiguity problem are all -complete for context-free omega-languages or for infinitary rational relations. Topological and arithmetical properties of 1-counter omega-languages, context free omega-languages, or infinitary rational relations, are also highly undecidable. These very surprising results provide the first examples of highly undecidable problems about the behaviour of very simple finite machines like 1-counter automata or 2-tape automata.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Algebra and Logic
