Robust determination of the major merger fraction at z = 0.6 in Groth Strip
C. L\'opez-Sanjuan (1), M. Balcells (1), C. E. Garc\'ia-Dab\'o (1 and, 2), M. Prieto (1, 3), D. Crist\'obal-Hornillos (1, 4), M. C., Eliche-Moral (1, 5), D. Abreu (1), P. Erwin (6), R. Guzm\'an (7) ((1) IAC,, Spain, (2) ESO, Germany, (3) ULL, Spain, (4) IAA, Spain, (5) UCM

TL;DR
This study accurately measures the galaxy major merger fraction at z=0.6 using asymmetry indices, addressing systematic errors, and finds low merger fractions with a specific evolution rate, contributing to understanding galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It introduces a robust method for measuring merger fractions at intermediate redshifts, carefully correcting for observational errors and morphological effects, providing new quantitative insights.
Findings
Merger fraction at z=0.6 is approximately 4.5% for certain luminosity thresholds.
Merger rate decreases with increasing galaxy mass.
Merger fraction evolution follows f_m(z) = f_m(0)(1+z)^2.9 ± 0.8.
Abstract
(Abridged) We measure the fraction of galaxies undergoing disk-disk major mergers (f_m) at intermediate redshifts (0.35 <= z < 0.85) by studying the asymmetry index A of galaxy images. Results are provided for B- and Ks-band absolute magnitude selected samples from the Groth strip in the GOYA photometric survey. Three sources of systematic error are carefully addressed: (i) we avoid morphological K-corrections, (ii) we measure asymmetries in artificially redshifted to z_d = 0.75 galaxies to lead with loss of morphological information with redshift, and (iii) we take into account the observational errors in z and A, that tend to overestimate the merger fraction, by maximum likelihood techniques. We find: (i) our data allow for a robust merger fraction to be provided for a single redshift bin centered at z=0.6. (ii) Merger fractions have low values: f_m = 0.045 for M_B <= -20 galaxies,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
