Different satellites - different GRB redshift distributions?
Z. Bagoly, L. G. Balazs, I. Horvath, J. Kelemen, A. Meszaros, P. Veres, and G. Tusnady

TL;DR
This study compares the redshift distributions of gamma-ray bursts detected by different satellites, revealing significant differences especially between Swift and HETE2, after accounting for observational biases.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of GRB redshift distributions across multiple satellites, highlighting satellite-specific biases and differences.
Findings
Significant difference in redshift distributions between Swift and HETE2.
Biases influence the observed redshift distributions.
Swift tends to detect GRBs with higher redshifts.
Abstract
The measured redshifts of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), which were first detected by the Swift satellite, seem to be bigger on average than the redshifts of GRBs detected by other satellites. We analyzed the redshift distribution of GRBs triggered and observed by different satellites (Swift[1], HETE2[2], BeppoSax, Ulyssses). After considering the possible biases significant difference was found at the p = 95.70% level in the redshift distributions of GRBs measured by HETE and the Swift.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
