On Galilean and Lorentz invariance in pilot-wave dynamics
Antony Valentini

TL;DR
This paper argues that pilot-wave theory's natural kinematics is Aristotelian, and that Galilean and Lorentz invariances are not fundamental symmetries but artificially imposed, challenging common assumptions about relativistic extensions.
Contribution
It clarifies the true kinematic nature of pilot-wave theory and questions the physical validity of seeking Lorentz-invariant extensions.
Findings
Galilean invariance is not fundamental in pilot-wave dynamics
The natural kinematics of the theory is Aristotelian
Searching for Lorentz-invariant extensions is misguided
Abstract
It is argued that the natural kinematics of the pilot-wave theory is Aristotelian. Despite appearances, Galilean invariance is not a fundamental symmetry of the low-energy theory. Instead, it is a fictitious symmetry that has been artificially imposed. It is concluded that the search for a Lorentz-invariant extension is physically misguided.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
