A Small Sample Correction for Estimating Attributable Risk in Case-Control Studies
Daniel B. Rubin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simple correction method for estimating attributable risk in case-control studies, especially useful with small samples or detailed stratification, improving accuracy and reducing noise.
Contribution
It presents a novel correction technique for attributable risk estimation in case-control studies that enhances bias reduction and precision in small samples.
Findings
Correction reduces bias in small samples
Estimates become less noisy with the correction
Method is useful for detailed stratification
Abstract
The attributable risk, often called the population attributable risk, is in many epidemiological contexts a more relevant measure of exposure-disease association than the excess risk, relative risk, or odds ratio. When estimating attributable risk with case-control data and a rare disease, we present a simple correction to the standard approach making it essentially unbiased, and also less noisy. As with analogous corrections given in Jewell (1986) for other measures of association, the adjustment often won't make a substantial difference unless the sample size is very small or point estimates are desired within fine strata, but we discuss the possible utility for applications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods in Epidemiology · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
