Jet breaks and Energetics of Swift GRB X-ray Afterglows
J. L. Racusin, E. W. Liang, D. N. Burrows, A. Falcone, T. Sakamoto, B., B. Zhang, B. Zhang, P. Evans, J. Osborne

TL;DR
This study systematically analyzes Swift-XRT GRB afterglow data to identify jet breaks, classify afterglow components, and examine implications for jet geometry and energetics, revealing new insights into the timing and detection of jet breaks.
Contribution
It introduces a method using closure relations to identify jet breaks in X-ray afterglows, including hidden ones, and compares Swift GRB energetics with pre-Swift data.
Findings
Approximately 12% of afterglows show strong evidence for jet breaks.
Around 30% of potential jet breaks are not obvious from light curves.
Swift GRBs have lower isotropic and collimation-corrected energies than pre-Swift GRBs.
Abstract
We present a systematic temporal and spectral study of all Swift-XRT observations of GRB afterglows discovered between 2005 January and 2007 December. After constructing and fitting all light curves and spectra to power-law models, we classify the components of each afterglow in terms of the canonical X-ray afterglow and test them against the closure relations of the forward shock models for a variety of parameter combinations. The closure relations are used to identify potential jet breaks with characteristics including the uniform jet model with and without lateral spreading and energy injection, and a power-law structured jet model, all with a range of parameters. With this technique, we survey the X-ray afterglows with strong evidence for jet breaks (~12% of our sample), and reveal cases of potential jet breaks that do not appear plainly from the light curve alone (another ~30%),…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
